The Mastering Mistake Every Producer Makes Pseudo-Mastering

The Mastering Mistake Every Producer Makes: Pseudo-Mastering


Mastering is a vital aspect of music production, often referred to as a ‘dark art’ due to its complex and nuanced nature. It involves enhancing the sound of a mix, making it ready for distribution. However, the digital age has introduced new challenges, including a trend that blurs the line between mixing and mastering – pseudo-mastering. This article delves into the intricacies and impacts of this trend.

The Changing Landscape of Music Production in the Digital Age

The digital age has dramatically reshaped the music production landscape. With the proliferation of advanced software and tools, producers and mix engineers have more control over the sound than ever before. However, this control has brought about new trends and challenges, one of which is the rise of pseudo-mastering.

The Rise of Pseudo-Mastering

Pseudo-mastering is a trend where mixers create a pre-treated mix, effectively acting as a preliminary master, to provide artists with an idea of what the final track might sound like. This trend has become increasingly popular over the past five years, with mix engineers often delivering mixes that are already loud, sometimes too loud.

The Challenges of Working with Pre-Treated Mixes

Working with pre-treated mixes poses several challenges for mastering engineers. Often, these mixes are so loud and distorted that it becomes difficult to make them louder without causing further distortion. This scenario places mastering engineers in a perplexing situation where they are expected to deliver a master that exceeds the loudness of an already loud pre-treat.

The Impact of Pseudo-Mastering on the Actual Mix

Pseudo-mastering can significantly alter the dynamics of the original mix. It can affect various elements such as the vocals, drums, and overall tonality, thus changing the sound entirely. This situation creates confusion since the artists and producers are commenting and making decisions based on the pre-treated mix, not the original.

The Confusion and Complexities in the Process

The confusion doesn’t stop there. Trying to recreate the effects of the pre-treat on the original mix often results in a master that sounds better than the pre-treated mix. However, convincing artists and producers to shift their focus away from the pre-treated mix they’ve become accustomed to can be a difficult task.

Breaking Away from Pre-Treated Mixes

The key to successfully navigating this complex process lies in separating the pre-treated mix from the actual master. Artists and producers need to understand that the mastering process is meant to enhance the original mix, not recreate the pre-treat.

The Importance of Accurate Representation of the Mix

A crucial aspect of mastering is presenting the mix accurately. Applying a ‘pseudo master’ or pre-treat to the mix is akin to viewing a photograph with an orange filter—it alters the original colors and dynamics. Therefore, it’s essential for artists and producers to hear the actual mix, not a louder or distorted version.

The Stereo Bus Dilemma

Another issue that arises is the stereo bus dilemma. Mixers often apply effects to the stereo bus, which is referred to as pre-treatment. Mastering engineers may request versions of the mix with and without these effects to get a clear picture of the original sound. This approach enables them to make informed decisions about how to enhance the mix during mastering.

The Perilous Trend of ‘Louder is Better’

In the pursuit of loudness, the industry seems to have fallen into a trap. The belief that ‘louder is better’ is proliferating, leading to mixes that are excessively loud. This trend undermines the principle that the mix should sound exactly as intended by the mixer, disregarding volume considerations.

The Consequence of Excessive Loudness

Excessive loudness can be jarring for listeners. There’s a misconception that a louder mix will prevent listeners from having to reach for the volume control. However, the opposite is often true. If a track is significantly louder than others in a playlist, listeners may find themselves scrambling to turn the volume down.

The Paradox of Control in Creative Work

Mastering, at its core, is a creative process. However, when clients dictate specifics such as loudness, the creative aspects can be sidelined. The irony lies in the fact that artists often approach mastering engineers for their expertise but end up dictating the final output. This approach undermines the value that mastering engineers bring to the table.

The Balance between Technical Demands and Creative Intentions

The key to effective mastering lies in finding a balance between technical demands and creative intentions. While achieving the desired loudness is part of the process, it shouldn’t override the goal of enhancing the overall sound of the mix. When mastering engineers are given the freedom to apply their expertise, the results can be far more satisfying.


In conclusion, mastering is a delicate process that involves a deep understanding of sound dynamics and the art of enhancement. The trend of pseudo-mastering and the pursuit of loudness have introduced new complexities. However, by focusing on the original mix and the intention behind it, mastering engineers can navigate these challenges and deliver masters that truly resonate with listeners.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is pseudo-mastering? Pseudo-mastering is when mix engineers create a pre-treated mix that sounds like a preliminary master, to give artists an idea of the final sound.
  2. How does pseudo-mastering impact the actual mix? Pseudo-mastering can significantly alter the dynamics of the actual mix, affecting various elements such as vocals, drums, and overall tonality.
  3. What is the stereo bus dilemma? The stereo bus dilemma refers to the issue of mixers applying effects to the stereo bus, which can alter the original mix and affect the mastering process.
  4. What is the consequence of excessive loudness in a mix? Excessive loudness can be jarring for listeners, often leading them to turn the volume down. It can also undermine the original intention of the mix.
  5. What is the balance between technical demands and creative intentions in mastering? The balance involves achieving the desired loudness while also enhancing the overall sound of the mix. It allows mastering engineers to apply their expertise effectively, leading to better sounding masters.

Share this post